Common interface for sensors/health monitoring

[Stephen Montgomery-Smith]

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Julian Elischer wrote:

> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>> * Alexander Leidinger <Alexander at Leidinger.net> [090822 10:44] wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:04:10 -0700 Julian Elischer
>>>> <julian at elischer.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> The purists won out in that one by shouting loudly and screaming
>>>>> about socialized healthware. Consequently we have 47 million
>>>>> unsupported devices.
>>>> You forgot to tell that now nobody wants to touch this subject anymore,
>>>> as he may be the target of similar shouting then.
>>> 
>>> I say good riddence, if someone wants thier hardware not to melt
>>> then each machine should be personally responsible and enroll in
>>> a private monitoring service we don't need project sponsored health
>>> monitoring.
>>> 
>>> (ron paul!)
>>> 
>> 
>> I think that this kind of talk calls for boycotting certain device drivers!
>
> In OpenBSD they have project sponsored healthware and sometimes you have to 
> wait in a queue to get you notifications, and sometimes
> the queue is so long events have to get merged! Not for me!
> I want all my individual events to be lost After I get them.
> It's my right!

Perhaps you are getting too much information through the cable network. 
Your system might be getting all "wee weed."