conf/128030: [request] Isn't it time to enable IPsec in GENERIC?

Sam Leffler sam at freebsd.org
Sat Oct 18 20:43:43 UTC 2008


Max Laier wrote:
> On Saturday 18 October 2008 19:05:26 Sam Leffler wrote:
>   
>> gavin at freebsd.org wrote:
>>     
>>> Synopsis: [request] Isn't it time to enable IPsec in GENERIC?
>>>
>>> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
>>> Responsible-Changed-By: gavin
>>> Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Oct 18 16:55:14 UTC 2008
>>> Responsible-Changed-Why:
>>> Over to maintainer(s) for consideration
>>>
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=128030
>>>       
>> Last I checked IPSEC added noticeable overhead.  Before anyone does this
>> you need to measure the cost of having it enabled but not used.
>>     
>
> It should be possible to turn IPSEC into a module - maybe only loadable on 
> boot to avoid locking issues.  This would reduce the overhead to a handful of 
> function pointer checks that should not impact performance (thanks to modern 
> branch prediction and cache sizes).  This would have to be measured as well, 
> of course.  Maybe this should go to the project page?  It's a good junior 
> kernel hacker project, I believe.
>
>   

I believe the most important issue are the SADB checks in the tx path.  
It used to be possible to do them cheaply by checking a single ptr value 
but now it's much more expensive.  My memory is hazy as it's been a while.

    Sam



More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list