New FreeBSD package system (a.k.a. Daemon Package System (dps))
des at des.no
Fri May 11 09:03:49 UTC 2007
Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org> writes:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:33:29AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> > Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org> writes:
> > > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:19:46AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> > > > Not if you want to use pre-built packages. You made sure of that when
> > > > you decided (against my objections) to include .la files in packages.
> > > I have a suspicion you're never going to let that go, but it's not
> > > relevant here anyway. Binaries have been hardcoding their build
> > > location (e.g. /usr/local) since the dawn of time.
> > Most don't.
> Assertion without proof. In fact a quick survey shows that 90% of my
> /usr/local/bin references /usr/local.
I forgot to answer this bit: of course they do, if they were linked in
the presence of .la files. Please understand that they are the problem,
not the solution.
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no
More information about the freebsd-hackers