Thread local storage not working with -fPIC and shared objects

Garrett Cooper youshi10 at u.washington.edu
Sat Mar 31 03:15:35 UTC 2007


Pieter de Goeje wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I have these files:
> --- loader.cpp ---
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include "tls.h"
>
> int main() {
>         tls = 0;
>         printf("%d\n", tls);
> }
>
> --- tls.cpp ---
> #include "tls.h"
> int __thread tls;
>
> --- tls.h ---
> extern __thread int tls;
>
> When I compile them like this:
> c++ -fPIC -o tls.so tls.cpp -shared
> c++ -fPIC -o loader loader.cpp tls.so
>
> And run the resulting program, I get:
> pyotr at nox:~/projects/misc/tls> ./loader
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./loader: Unsupported relocation type 37 in non-PLT 
> relocations
>
> When I omit -fPIC, it runs fine. But I need fPIC for the shared object on 
> amd64 arch. I've tried it on Linux/i386 (gcc 4.1) and it ran fine (with 
> fPIC).
>
> Much to my surprise however, a particularly large application I'm working on 
> did compile & run on FreeBSD/amd64 using -fpic (lowercase) and gcc 4.3. 
> Trying -fpic on FreeBSD/i386 resulted in failure.
>
> FYI, I need tls to work because I'm using OpenMP's tls (#pragma omp 
> threadprivate()) support in gcc 4.3.
>
> The workaround I found on FreeBSD/amd64 was linking the main executable 
> with -fno-PIC, or building everything with -fpic. (both workarounds didn't 
> work on FreeBSD/i386)
>
> I would be grateful if someone could shed some light on this.
>
> Regards,
> Pieter de Goeje
Pieter,
    Did you know that -fPIC and -fpic aren't the same? From 
<http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.2/gcc/Code-Gen-Options.html#Code-Gen-Options>:

|-fpic|
    Generate position-independent code (PIC) suitable for use in a
    shared library, if supported for the target machine. Such code
    accesses all constant addresses through a global offset table (GOT).
    The dynamic loader resolves the GOT entries when the program starts
    (the dynamic loader is not part of GCC; it is part of the operating
    system). If the GOT size for the linked executable exceeds a
    machine-specific maximum size, you get an error message from the
    linker indicating that -fpic does not work; in that case, recompile
    with -fPIC instead. (These maximums are 8k on the SPARC and 32k on
    the m68k and RS/6000. The 386 has no such limit.)

    Position-independent code requires special support, and therefore
    works only on certain machines. For the 386, GCC supports PIC for
    System V but not for the Sun 386i. Code generated for the IBM
    RS/6000 is always position-independent.

|-fPIC|
    If supported for the target machine, emit position-independent code,
    suitable for dynamic linking and avoiding any limit on the size of
    the global offset table. This option makes a difference on the m68k,
    PowerPC and SPARC.

    Position-independent code requires special support, and therefore
    works only on certain machines.

Cheers,
-Garrett


More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list