a question regarding <sys/shm.h>
freebsd-listen at fabiankeil.de
Wed Jan 31 14:58:07 UTC 2007
Robert Watson <rwatson at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > Pascal Hofstee <caelian at gmail.com> writes:
> >> Any additional sugestions/objections are always greatly appreciated.
> > On 32-bit platforms (i386, powerpc), int is a 32-bit signed integer while
> > size_t is a 32-bit unsigned integer.
> > On 64-bit platforms (amd64, sparc64 etc), int is a 32-bit signed integer
> > while size_t is a 64-bit unsigned integer.
> > In both cases, changing this structure member from int to size_t will break
> > the ABI.
> > This doesn't mean you shouldn't do it, just that it should be done with
> > care.
> If we do decide to go ahead with the ABI change, there are a number of other
> things that should be done simultaneously, such as changing the uid and gid
> fields to uid_t and gid_t.
struct tm's members could be changed as well.
Quoting a response I got from Juliusz Chroboczek
(the author of Polipo) after reporting a compiler
|By the way, IEEE 1003.1-2003 says that tv_sec should be a time_t,
|hence by making it a long, FreeBSD and NetBSD are violating the POSIX
|standard. Could you please file a bug report with them?
I didn't find any claims about FreeBSD being IEEE 1003.1-2003
compliant and therefore didn't consider it a bug, but given that
the topic is *_t changes and time_t hasn't come up yet,
I'd like to mention it anyway.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20070131/b3791fba/signature.pgp
More information about the freebsd-hackers