portupgrade O(n^m)?

[Florent Thoumie]

youshi10 at u.washington.edu wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Coleman Kane wrote:
> 
>> On 2/15/07, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander at leidinger.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Quoting Olivier Warin <daffy at xview.net> (from Wed, 14 Feb 2007
>>> 19:54:09 +0100):
>>>
>>> > This issue is not only related to portupgrade, pkg_add a new port
>>> takes
>>> > far too long now... and make index each time I upgrade my ports is
>>> > awfull too.
>>>
>>> Regarding "make index": try "make fetchindex" right after the cvsup.
>>> IT may not be up to the point with the cvsupped stuff, but not far off.
>>>
>>> Bye,
>>> Alexander.
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't think we who use the modular X.org tree can do this since a
>> number
>> of the ports won't be properly registered in the file (or am I off-base
>> here?).
>> -- 
>> Coleman
> 
> Heh, that is a serious problem considering that modular Xorg would
> probably at max add about 100 ~ 150~some packages to the portage tree,
> depending on how things are done.

Yeah, I propose we just stay with X.org 6.9.0.

PS: This is "ports tree" really, not "portage tree".

-- 
Florent Thoumie
flz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Committer

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20070215/d0292951/signature.pgp