em blues
soralx at cydem.org
soralx at cydem.org
Wed Oct 11 20:56:34 PDT 2006
> On 10/11/06, Danny Braniss <danny at cs.huji.ac.il> wrote:
> > the box is a bit old (Intel Pentium III (933.07-MHz 686-class CPU)
> > dual cpu.
> >
> > running iperf -c (receiving):
> >
> > freebsd-4.10 0.0-10.0 sec 936 MBytes 785 Mbits/sec
> > freebsd-5.4 0.0-10.0 sec 413 MBytes 346 Mbits/sec
> > freebsd.6.1 0.0-10.0 sec 366 MBytes 307 Mbits/sec
> > freebsd-6.2 0.0-10.0 sec 344 MBytes 289 Mbits/sec
> >
> > btw, iperf -s (xmitting) is slightly better
> > freebsd-4.10 0.0-10.0 sec 664 MBytes 558 Mbits/sec
> > freebsd-5.4 0.0-10.0 sec 390 MBytes 327 Mbits/sec
> > freebsd-6.1 0.0-10.0 sec 495 MBytes 415 Mbits/sec
> > freebsd-6.2 0.0-10.0 sec 487 MBytes 408 Mbits/sec
> >
> > so, it seems that as the release number increases, the em
> > throughput gets worse - or iperf is.
>
> You arent measuring em, you're measuring RELEASES on
> your hardware, is this a surprise on a P3, no.
still, 63% drop in performance doesn't cause much joy, does it?
[SorAlx] ridin' VN1500-B2
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list