Yet another magic symlinks implementation
Oliver Fromme
olli at lurza.secnetix.de
Mon Nov 6 09:50:56 UTC 2006
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> > It is interesting to note that DragonFly has had variant symlnks for
> > a long time, but we haven't actually found a use for them yet.
>
> Yes, Matt. Some time ago i've ported Df's variant symlinks too :)
> http://butcher.heavennet.ru/patches/kernel/varsym/
>
> This task was declared on the ideas page:
> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/#p-magicsymlinks
>
> But i don't see an interest in this feature among commiters. :(
>
> > Originally I envisioned using variant symlinks as part of a packaging
> > system to allow package environments to be built on the fly, thus
> > allowing multiple versions of libraries to coreside and not have the
> > 'you have to upgrade everything to install one new thing' problem.
> > But that was before we adopted pkgsrc. Pkgsrc doesn't use varsyms,
> > so...
>
> Yes, i think varsyms can be usefull in build enviroments. Somebody spoke that
> varsyms can be usable in a cluster or jailed enviroments.
FWIW, if FreeBSD had variant symlinks, I would definitely
use that feature for jailed environments.
Another task: I've written an rc script for my notebook
which detects the network environment (home, office, wlan,
offline) by pinging some IP addresses. Then it configures
several files in /etc for that environment (rc.conf, hosts,
ntp.conf, resolv.conf, fstab, etc.). Currently this is
done by modifying a bunch of symlimks in /etc each time the
notebook is rebooted. I don't like that "solution" at all;
in fact I would prefer the root file system to stay read-
only. If variant symlinks were available in FreeBSD, the
problem could be solved easily.
I'm afraid that I don't like NetBSD's "magic symlinks" very
much. It's less flexible than variant symlinks because it
only supports a fixed set of variables. As far as I can
tell, it does not solve any of the tasks described above.
Therefore I would really like to see your port of DragonFly
BSD's variant symlinks comitted to FreeBSD. Of course, it
could be a compile-time option in case there are people who
don't want the code in their kernel at all. But you have
to set a sysctl anyway to enable it globally (it's disabled
by default on DragonFly).
Just my 2 cents.
Best regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing
Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd
Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author
and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way.
"Documentation is like sex; when it's good, it's very, very good,
and when it's bad, it's better than nothing."
-- Dick Brandon
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list