sockstat tcp/udp switches

[Giorgos Keramidas]

On 2006-11-02 20:48, Brooks Davis <brooks at one-eyed-alien.net> wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 04:46:21AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>On 2006-11-02 18:34, Josh Carroll <josh.carroll at psualum.com> wrote:
>>> >Can we have something that doesn't need one option letter for each
>>> >protocol, protocol family or socket type, please? :)
>>> 
>>> I'd be willing to modify it to take a -P argument with one of:
>>> 
>>> tcp
>>> udp
>>> tcp,udp
>>> udp,tcp
>>> 
>>> If the consensus is to add -P, I'd be happy to make the changes. I
>>> assume without -P we'd want to show both, so perhaps udp,tcp and
>>> tcp,udp aren't necessary.
>> 
>> Quite right.  If the default is to show *both*, then we only need to
>> specify one of them in the -P argument.  If you want, for the sake of
>> completeness to support the "-P proto[,proto]" syntax too, that's also
>> fine, I guess :)
> 
> We're getting SCTP support RSN so that's probably a good idea...

Precisely.  This is why I said "for the sake of completeness", since
adding the support for proto[,proto] parsing will make this immensely
easier when sctp gets committed to CVS :)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20061103/f391b348/attachment.pgp