organization

[Iasen Kostov]

Warner Losh wrote:

>From: mohamed aslan <maslanbsd at gmail.com>
>Subject: Re: organization
>Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:41:25 -0800
>
>  
>
>>guys this is not a flame war
>>but the linux way in arranging the source file is really better than
>>freebsd way, it's a fact.
>>however it's easy to rearrange it in 1 min as someone said before.
>>but i mean this step should be done from the core team.
>>for example all fs has to go in a subdir called fs
>>arch specific file should go in subdir called arch/(arch name)
>>and so on .
>>    
>>
>
>The problem is getting consensus on what is to be done.  Sure, one can
>arbitrarily say this goes here or that goes there, but everyone's
>notion of reorg is a little different.  It would take a lot of time
>and energy to get this consensus, which is better spent making things
>work better...
>
>Warner
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
>  
>
    And the worts of all is that You are both right to some extent. The 
new developers want the source tree arranged in the way mohamed says it 
should be. Not some device drivers live in pci/ other in dev/ and things 
like that. And on the other hand experienced kernel hackers who want 
things to stay as they are so it is easy for them to navigate in know 
waters. IMHO mohamed is a bit "more" right.