5-STABLE kernel build with icc broken

[c0ldbyte]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, c0ldbyte wrote:

> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 gerarra at tin.it wrote:
>
>>> 
>>> Without intending to start any compiler holy wars, what benefits does
>>> ICC provide over GCC for the end user?
>>> 
>> 
>> ICC would provide better low level code (remind: Intel C Compiler. It would
>> mean better performance).
>> 
>> rookie
>> 
>
> If any, still produces not all that much of a difference of code between
> the newer gcc34 and as much performance differance as your going to get
> isnt going to even be noticeable in the long run. Your just setting your
> self up for failure with something that isnt really going to give you
> the desired effects.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> 	--c0ldbyte
>

PS: There is coders from Intel that do work on some of the code for gcc34.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
Comment: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF7DF979F

iD8DBQFCRwlhsmFQuvffl58RAq83AJsGKYklfVtdxeT8UcIcJ21TaqAmiQCfY6Fz
JhQgmTHP66gd6ySeo0zueHc=
=RrMC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----