ntfsprogs under FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE not working?
Florent Thoumie
flz at xbsd.org
Mon Mar 21 05:07:48 PST 2005
Le Lundi 21 mars 2005 à 13:58 +0100, Jilles Tjoelker a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:24:34PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> > Le Vendredi 18 mars 2005 à 09:25 -0800, Murray Stokely a écrit :
> > > I'm having trouble using ntfsls from a recently built
> > > sysutils/ntfsprogs port. Is anyone successfully using this port? The
> > > package is only 230k when built without GNOME VFS support, but it just
> > > doesn't seem to work. I'd like to put this tool onto FreeBSD DVDs
> > > (and CDs if it fits).
>
> > This simple patch makes ntfsls work fine, but I don't think
> > removing locks is a good solution.
>
> > I'm cc'ing hackers@ to get review from people used to fcntl(2)
> > interface.
>
> Yes, devfs does not support file locks. And according to POSIX, support
> for file locks on non-regular files is not mandatory. It also
> seems the support cannot easily be added because the annoying issue
> of the size of a device. Also this will not help you to get it running
> on currently existing versions of FreeBSD.
>
> That said, the locking is useful in case people run two ntfs programs at
> the same time. You could use separate lockfiles but afaik there is no
> standard for lockfiles for block devices (there is for serial ports).
Ok, I'll add the patch then, thanks for this information.
--
Florent Thoumie
flz at xbsd.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20050321/51c05a00/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list