FUD about CGD and GBDE

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

In message <200503052106.05001.abuse at spamalicious.com>, "Charles M. Hannum" wri
tes:

>While you might claim that the dedication to study the user's behavior and 
>mount such an attack is fanciful, I claim that it is not.  Under observation, 
>GBDE's additional techniques do not stand up to the claim of being "spook 
>strength".

GBDE only makes that claim for a "cold disk" for pretty much the very
reasons you mention.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.