bug in calcru() - the clock is ticking

Chris Landauer cal at rush.aero.org
Mon Jan 31 22:47:31 PST 2005


hihi, all -

i am currently running the experiment with both suggestions - doug's one of
simply re-ordering the equations, and my more complicated one with the
conditional (and the re-ordering) - the first significant data point will come
tomorrow, when the test cpu times pass the first error threshold of the
current set of equations

i will report the experimental results as i get them - a full description of
the analysis and experimental activities can be found on the web (and will be
updated as i get more results, generally every day or two, until the two
programs diverge in behavior, or i get tired of it)

http://www.cs.umd.edu/~cal/math/overflow-analysis.txt

it seems quite clear to me that just re-ordering the equations (part of doug's
original suggestion) would be a very good interim fix - it would clearly not
change any of the timing or values computed for short programs, and would only
affect programs that are high-usage for long times, making user programs fail
later, and system programs fail sooner (if there are any)

i asked before (does anybody know the answer?) - are there long running, high
utilization programs that are mostly system time? or mostly interrrupt time?
if not, then i recommend the re-ordering fix until the results of the analysis
and the experiments are in

more soon,
cal

Chris Landauer
Aerospace Integration Science Center
The Aerospace Corporation
cal at aero.org


More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list