Benchmark: NetBSD 2.0 beats FreeBSD 5.3
Ceri Davies
ceri at submonkey.net
Fri Jan 7 01:21:13 PST 2005
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 01:10:04AM -0800, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
>
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > the benchmark you cited is for uniprocessor systems
> > only.
> > It says nothing about multiprocessor performance,
> > which is what FreeBSD
> > is aiming for.
> Doesn't the (ULE) scheduler have a switch to ensure
> that performance is optimal on a uniprocessor machine
> too?
I don't know, but if it did that would only affect scheduling, and
only in the ULE case at that. ULE was broken in 5.3-RELEASE.
I don't really think that this benchmark is bad news for either OS. My
only real concern are the process creation/termination results on FreeBSD.
Ceri
--
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm
not sure about the former. -- Einstein (attrib.)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20050107/d5042dd8/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list