preferable way to control kernel module

[Matthew N. Dodd]

On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Julian Elischer wrote:
> In the past, I've used a sysctl to communicate out the syscall number.
>
> you only need to do the syscall once,
> and it confirms to the program that the syscall is correctly installed.

Why not just use a sysctl period?  Think of it as "syscall by name".

-- 
10 40 80 C0 00 FF FF FF FF C0 00 00 00 00 10 AA AA 03 00 00 00 08 00