usbd config file parse behaviour
Bernd Walter
ticso at cicely12.cicely.de
Sun Mar 28 02:50:07 PST 2004
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 01:31:03AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20040328002334.GA15543 at cicely12.cicely.de>
> Bernd Walter <ticso at cicely12.cicely.de> writes:
> : On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 04:55:56PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > In message: <20040326074634.GG94505 at cicely12.cicely.de>
> : > Bernd Walter <ticso at cicely12.cicely.de> writes:
> : > : I'm working on getting devd(8) usable for usb devices.
> : >
> : > The part I'm not sure about is where you add the pnpinfo to the
> : > devaddq stuff. All that stuff should generally be in devaddq. Why
> : > did you did it the way you did and what were you able to gain by it?
> :
> : Fact is that we need more information then available for attach/detach
> : statements right now to replace usbd - especially the serial number of
> : a device was the part that I'm interested in.
>
> OK. That makes sense.
>
> : What still puzzles me is why pnpinfo is currently only part in case of
> : unassigned new devices - it looks intentionaly to be left out for other
> : cases - therefor the current patch just adds it in the most simple way
> : to test the other part and was never intended as a commit candidate.
> : Do you think there could be problems with pnpinfo for other type of
> : devices (cardbus, pcmcia, acpi, ...)?
>
> No problems. I didn't add it because I originally thought that devd
> could look up the device and tease it out. However, it would be
> convenient to have this information at hand, and it does eliminate a
> potential race condition to provide it all at once. The only thing I
> worry about it exceeding some static limit in devd/devctl. And if we
> do, we can increase it because we malloc things in the kernel and
> having a bigger userland buffer isn't going to hurt.
>
> I'll look into these issues and see how hard this will be.
Thanks.
> Btw, any interest in making it possible to kldload a usb module and
> having device attach to it? Right now the usb code assumes that you
> can unplug the device and replug it back in. I have at least two
> devices on my laptop that can't be removed (bluetooth and memory stick
> reader), so I can't dynamically load drivers for them...
I'll think about it.
Reprobing is not so much an issue as selecting an interface for it.
--
B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de
ticso at bwct.de info at bwct.de
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list