usbd config file parse behaviour

Bernd Walter ticso at cicely12.cicely.de
Sun Mar 28 02:50:07 PST 2004


On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 01:31:03AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20040328002334.GA15543 at cicely12.cicely.de>
>             Bernd Walter <ticso at cicely12.cicely.de> writes:
> : On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 04:55:56PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > In message: <20040326074634.GG94505 at cicely12.cicely.de>
> : >             Bernd Walter <ticso at cicely12.cicely.de> writes:
> : > : I'm working on getting devd(8) usable for usb devices.
> : > 
> : > The part I'm not sure about is where you add the pnpinfo to the
> : > devaddq stuff.  All that stuff should generally be in devaddq.  Why
> : > did you did it the way you did and what were you able to gain by it?
> : 
> : Fact is that we need more information then available for attach/detach
> : statements right now to replace usbd - especially the serial number of
> : a device was the part that I'm interested in.
> 
> OK.  That makes sense.
> 
> : What still puzzles me is why pnpinfo is currently only part in case of
> : unassigned new devices - it looks intentionaly to be left out for other
> : cases - therefor the current patch just adds it in the most simple way
> : to test the other part and was never intended as a commit candidate.
> : Do you think there could be problems with pnpinfo for other type of
> : devices (cardbus, pcmcia, acpi, ...)?
> 
> No problems.  I didn't add it because I originally thought that devd
> could look up the device and tease it out.  However, it would be
> convenient to have this information at hand, and it does eliminate a
> potential race condition to provide it all at once.  The only thing I
> worry about it exceeding some static limit in devd/devctl.  And if we
> do, we can increase it because we malloc things in the kernel and
> having a bigger userland buffer isn't going to hurt.
> 
> I'll look into these issues and see how hard this will be.

Thanks.

> Btw, any interest in making it possible to kldload a usb module and
> having device attach to it?  Right now the usb code assumes that you
> can unplug the device and replug it back in.  I have at least two
> devices on my laptop that can't be removed (bluetooth and memory stick
> reader), so I can't dynamically load drivers for them...

I'll think about it.
Reprobing is not so much an issue as selecting an interface for it.

-- 
B.Walter                   BWCT                http://www.bwct.de
ticso at bwct.de                                  info at bwct.de



More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list