Future of RAIDFrame

[Harald Schmalzbauer]

On Monday 12 January 2004 07:33, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <xzphdz2qicf.fsf at dwp.des.no>, Dag-Erling
> =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=
>
>  writes:
> >"M. Warner Losh" <imp at bsdimp.com> writes:
> >> Maybe this would be a good test-case for seeing how well it works?
> >> Maybe not.  We do need to run a few more test-cases for things through
> >> this scenario...  I'm not sure this one is well suited to it.
> >
> >If we toss out Vinum, there's a significant risk that 5.3 will ship
> >without RAID support at all.  I'm pretty certain we don't want that.

Just my opinion: That's way worse than having no software RAID!
No qualified explanations, just a opinion.

-Harry

>
> If we don't do something drastic, there's a significant risk that
> 5.3 and all future releases will ship with partially broken RAID
> support.  I'm pretty certain we don't want that either.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20040113/af6e4fb2/attachment.bin