[PATCH] : libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c

Dan Langille dan at langille.org
Mon Sep 29 06:21:04 PDT 2003


On 29 Sep 2003 at 9:02, Daniel Eischen wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
> 
> > On 18 Sep 2003 at 7:50, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > Right, this seems correct to me.
> > 
> > All our testing on this patch has been successful.  I'm going to do a 
> > few more tests on different hardware under 4.8-stable.
> > 
> > What's the next step?  Commit it?  Get others to test with it first?  
> 
> Sure, it looks good enough to commit.

Good.  I'd commit it, but.....

> > > > The problem  found when running under pthreads on 4.8-stable [i.e. 
> > > > EOT is not returned to the application code] is not found with libkse 
> > > > on 5.1-current.
> > 
> > FWIW: our regression tests are failing under 5.1 and we suspect that 
> > MTIOCERRSTAT ioctl() has changed since 4.8.  We're getting:
> > 
> > btape: dev.c:1119 Doing MTIOCERRSTAT errno=22 ERR=Invalid argument
> > 
> > We'll continue with our 5.1 work, but we'd like to finish up with 4.8 
> > ASAP.
> 
> Well, I can commit it to -current first, then it can go into
> -stable.  I'm not sure about the ioctl, though.

OK, please do commit to -current.  How long do you think is an 
appropriate delay until MFC?  7 days?   

-- 
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/



More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list