[PATCH] : libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c
dan at langille.org
Mon Sep 29 06:21:04 PDT 2003
On 29 Sep 2003 at 9:02, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 18 Sep 2003 at 7:50, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > >
> > > Right, this seems correct to me.
> > All our testing on this patch has been successful. I'm going to do a
> > few more tests on different hardware under 4.8-stable.
> > What's the next step? Commit it? Get others to test with it first?
> Sure, it looks good enough to commit.
Good. I'd commit it, but.....
> > > > The problem found when running under pthreads on 4.8-stable [i.e.
> > > > EOT is not returned to the application code] is not found with libkse
> > > > on 5.1-current.
> > FWIW: our regression tests are failing under 5.1 and we suspect that
> > MTIOCERRSTAT ioctl() has changed since 4.8. We're getting:
> > btape: dev.c:1119 Doing MTIOCERRSTAT errno=22 ERR=Invalid argument
> > We'll continue with our 5.1 work, but we'd like to finish up with 4.8
> > ASAP.
> Well, I can commit it to -current first, then it can go into
> -stable. I'm not sure about the ioctl, though.
OK, please do commit to -current. How long do you think is an
appropriate delay until MFC? 7 days?
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
More information about the freebsd-hackers