Update: Debox sendfile modifications

[Robert Watson]

On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Igor Sysoev wrote:

> As to worker kthreads I think it's better to queue aio operation as it
> was made in src/sys/kern/vfs_aio.c:aio_qphysio(). 

One of the things that worries me about the proposal to use kernel worker
threads to perform the I/O is that this can place a fairly low upper bound
on effective parallelism, unless the kernel threads themselves can issue
the I/O's asynchronously.  In the network stack itself, we are event and
queue driven without blocking--if we can maintain the apparent semantics
to the application, it would be very nice to be able to handle that at the
socket layer itself.  I.e., not waste a thread + stack per "in-progress" 
operation, and instead have a worker or two that simply propel operations
up and down the stack (similar to geom_up and geom_down). 

Robert N M Watson             FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
robert at fledge.watson.org      Network Associates Laboratories