narvi at haldjas.folklore.ee
Thu May 15 15:56:27 PDT 2003
On Thu, 15 May 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 12:26:19AM +0300, Narvi wrote:
> > > If you set yourself some simple goals and keep it high-level, then
> > > we can all get used to the idea and we will probably find other
> > > opportunities while we go. The end result can be much the same as
> > > you try to achieve now, except that it has a bigger chance to be
> > > integrated rather than some weird bunch on the side that plays
> > > with compiler options "and shit".
> > nah, don't be too hard on them. they are volunteering for a large amount
> > of hard work 8-)
> Hard work it is, but the question of timing pops up: when there's
> so much that needs to be done functionality-wise, how does the
> hard work relate to progress? Of course, this being a voluntary
> project, people are free to spend their time on things they like
> to do. But with freedom comes opposition -- or something along
> those lines :-)
Ultimately, they have to prove themselves and make sure what they produce
gets used - otherwise they fail.
> If I would be asked to sacrifice implementation flexibility at a
> time when things may need to be rewritten a couple of times to get
> it right (think new platforms), I will be mostly insensitive to
> arguments that limit that flexibility in favor of performance.
But if they are going to do this they don't understand how the project
works, and will probably fail at any rate.
> This is the root of my concern. Any team that seperates itself as
> one that focusses on performance, is one that finds opposition and
> the opposition may be too large to be able to do any performance
> related work. It has to come natural, like enforcing style(9), or
> security. Not that enforcing style(9) is without friction. But it's
> a well-known and (almost :-) acceptable part of development. I
> think performance has to be that too if we don't want it to be a
> constant source of conflicts.
> If a performance team could achieve that, then we're in for a
> winner. /me thinks,
Yes, true. But its not a simple target 8-)
> Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel at xcllnt.net
More information about the freebsd-hackers