linux binary blues
Bogdan TARU
bgd at icomag.de
Wed May 14 04:26:25 PDT 2003
Hi Hackers,
I have a linux binary that runs well under a jail on a FreeBSD 4.8, but
fails to run on a jaili on 4.7 (obviously, both have linux compatibility
installed).
As far as I know (don't have the sources of this linux binary), it tries
to get a lock on a file which is called engine.pid. That failes on 4.7.
The ktraces on the systems look like:
Good (jail on 4.8):
582 engine NAMI "/home/test/testbot/var/run/engine.pid"
582 engine RET open 3
582 engine CALL semget(0x3,0x6,0xbfbfe820)
582 engine RET semget 0
582 engine CALL getpid
582 engine RET getpid 582/0x246
582 engine CALL select(0x3,0)
582 engine RET select 0
582 engine CALL write(0x3,0x864c28c,0x4)
582 engine GIO fd 3 wrote 4 bytes
Failed (jail on 4.7):
10995 engine NAMI "/usr/home/ohsandy/sandy/var/run/engine.pid"
10995 engine RET open 3
10995 engine CALL semget(0x3,0x6,0xbfbfe800)
10995 engine RET semget -1 errno -22 Unknown error: -22(
10995 engine CALL ktrace(0x8690000)
10995 engine RET ktrace 141099008/0x8690000
10995 engine CALL ktrace(0x869d000)
10995 engine RET ktrace 141152256/0x869d000
10995 engine CALL fchdir(0xbfbfe60c)
10995 engine RET fchdir 1052904408/0x3ec20bd8
10995 engine CALL open(0x852e160,0x441,0x1b6)
10995 engine NAMI "/compat/linux/usr/home/ohsandy/sandy/var/log"
10995 engine NAMI "/usr/home/ohsandy/sandy/var/log/error.log"
I don't know, though, why the semget(2) has different values for the
third argument (0xbfbfe820 != 0xbfbfe800), if the binary is the same and
the linux libraries (as far as I can tell) are the same (tried with the
4.7 linux_base package, and as well with the 4.8 linux_base package
installed on the 4.7 system).
So, any ideas of what could go wrong, and if there are any chances of
getting this binary to run on a 4.7?
Thanks,
bogdan
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list