ports/160224: building x11-toolkits/gtk30 fails

[Tsurutani Naoki]

The following reply was made to PR ports/160224; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Tsurutani Naoki <turutani at scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
To: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org, mezz at freebsd.org
Cc: gnome at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/160224: building x11-toolkits/gtk30 fails
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:41:58 +0900

 It's too huge...
 After deinstalling japanese/sed and rebuilding devel/libtool,
 x11-toolkits/gtk30 can be built.
 "diff -urN" of the workspace says, except the path of sed,
 only one file differs (except binary); work/gtk+-3.0.12/gtk/gtktypefuncs.c.
 Here is a result of diff:
 --- gtk30/work/gtk+-3.0.12/gtk/gtktypefuncs.c 2012-03-16 17:12:00.000000000 +0900
 +++ gtk30.clean/work/gtk+-3.0.12/gtk/gtktypefuncs.c 2012-03-16 14:43:49.000000000 +0900
 @@ -60,21 +60,21 @@
  *tp++ = gdk_window_window_class_get_type();
  *tp++ = gdk_wm_decoration_get_type();
  *tp++ = gdk_wm_function_get_type();
 -#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11n*tp++ = gdk_x11_app_launch_context_get_type();n#endif
 -#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11n*tp++ = gdk_x11_cursor_get_type();n#endif
 -#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11n*tp++ = gdk_x11_device_core_get_type();n#endif
 -#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11n*tp++ = gdk_x11_device_manager_core_get_type();n#endif
 -#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11n*tp++ = gdk_x11_device_manager_xi2_get_type();n#endif
 -#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11n*tp++ = gdk_x11_device_manager_xi_get_type();n#endif
 -#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11n*tp++ = gdk_x11_device_xi2_get_type();n#endif
 -#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11n*tp++ = gdk_x11_device_xi_get_type();n#endif
 -#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11n*tp++ = gdk_x11_display_get_type();n#endif
 -#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11n*tp++ = gdk_x11_display_manager_get_type();n#endif
 -#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11n*tp++ = gdk_x11_drag_context_get_type();n#endif
 -#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11n*tp++ = gdk_x11_keymap_get_type();n#endif
 -#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11n*tp++ = gdk_x11_screen_get_type();n#endif
 -#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11n*tp++ = gdk_x11_visual_get_type();n#endif
 -#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11n*tp++ = gdk_x11_window_get_type();n#endif
 +*tp++ = gdk_x11_app_launch_context_get_type();
 +*tp++ = gdk_x11_cursor_get_type();
 +*tp++ = gdk_x11_device_core_get_type();
 +*tp++ = gdk_x11_device_manager_core_get_type();
 +*tp++ = gdk_x11_device_manager_xi2_get_type();
 +*tp++ = gdk_x11_device_manager_xi_get_type();
 +*tp++ = gdk_x11_device_xi2_get_type();
 +*tp++ = gdk_x11_device_xi_get_type();
 +*tp++ = gdk_x11_display_get_type();
 +*tp++ = gdk_x11_display_manager_get_type();
 +*tp++ = gdk_x11_drag_context_get_type();
 +*tp++ = gdk_x11_keymap_get_type();
 +*tp++ = gdk_x11_screen_get_type();
 +*tp++ = gdk_x11_visual_get_type();
 +*tp++ = gdk_x11_window_get_type();
  *tp++ = gtk_about_dialog_get_type();
  *tp++ = gtk_accel_flags_get_type();
  *tp++ = gtk_accel_group_get_type();
 @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@
  *tp++ = gtk_paper_size_get_type();
  *tp++ = gtk_path_priority_type_get_type();
  *tp++ = gtk_path_type_get_type();
 -#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11n*tp++ = gtk_plug_get_type();n#endif
 +*tp++ = gtk_plug_get_type();
  *tp++ = gtk_policy_type_get_type();
  *tp++ = gtk_position_type_get_type();
  *tp++ = gtk_print_context_get_type();
 @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@
  *tp++ = gtk_size_group_get_type();
  *tp++ = gtk_size_group_mode_get_type();
  *tp++ = gtk_size_request_mode_get_type();
 -#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11n*tp++ = gtk_socket_get_type();n#endif
 +*tp++ = gtk_socket_get_type();
  *tp++ = gtk_sort_type_get_type();
  *tp++ = gtk_spin_button_get_type();
  *tp++ = gtk_spin_button_update_policy_get_type();
 
 I do not know where this difference comes from.