console-kit-daemon leaking file descriptors?
Joe Marcus Clarke
marcus at marcuscom.com
Sun Apr 19 20:07:05 UTC 2009
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 21:04 +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 02:45:21AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 18:32 +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 10:59:32PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > > Then that means you have a deeper problem. Most likely you do not have
> > > > procfs mounted on /proc. The console or /var/log/messages should have
> > > > warnings.
> > >
> > > Hmm. Yes it does. I wasn't aware that GNOME required procfs mounted.
> > It's in the general GNOME FAQ and HAL FAQ. You definitely need procfs
> > mounted.
> The wording in both the FAQs appear to imply that procfs is optional.
> Perhaps it should be changed to say that procfs is required for GNOME
> to function correctly?
How does this sound optional:
"All users _MUST_ have procfs mounted on /proc."
That's from the HAL FAQ.
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20090419/f002e9fb/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-gnome