ports/115023: inconsistency in XML catalog location

Don Lewis truckman at FreeBSD.org
Sun Jul 29 23:52:59 UTC 2007

On 29 Jul, pav at FreeBSD.org wrote:
> Synopsis: inconsistency in XML catalog location
> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: pav
> State-Changed-When: Sun Jul 29 23:09:02 UTC 2007
> State-Changed-Why: 
> The /usr/local/share/xml/catalog file on my computer includes catalog.ports:
> <catalog xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:entity:xmlns:xml:catalog">
>   <nextCatalog catalog="/usr/local/share/xml/catalog.ports"/>
> </catalog>
> Yours does not?
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115023

Hmn, interesting.  Yes it does, but this doesn't seem to work, at least
on one of my machines.

I just compared the catalog files between two of my machines.  The one
where I am seeing problems has a bunch of extra stuff in the catalog

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE catalog PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD Entity Resolution XML Catalog V1.0//EN"

<catalog xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:entity:xmlns:xml:catalog">
<delegatePublic publicIdStartString="-//OASIS//ENTITIES DocBook XML" catalog="fi
le:///usr/local/share/xml/docbook/catalog" />
<delegatePublic publicIdStartString="-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML" catalog="file://
/usr/local/share/xml/docbook/catalog" />
<delegateSystem systemIdStartString="http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/" catalog
="file:///usr/local/share/xml/docbook/catalog" />
<delegateURI uriStartString="http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/" catalog="file:/
//usr/local/share/xml/docbook/catalog" />
<delegatePublic publicIdStartString="ISO 8879:1986" catalog="file:///usr/local/s
hare/xml/docbook/catalog" />
<delegateSystem systemIdStartString="http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/
" catalog="file:///usr/local/share/xml/docbook/catalog" />
<delegateURI uriStartString="http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/" catalo
g="file:///usr/local/share/xml/docbook/catalog" />
<nextCatalog catalog="/usr/local/share/xml/catalog.ports" />

I just took a look at /usr/local/share/xml/docbook/catalog and it has a
2003 timestamp.  I wonder if that could be the problem ;-)

I wonder if it's too late for a note in /usr/ports/UPDATING ...

More information about the freebsd-gnome mailing list