Unable to re-install gnumeric

[Kevin Oberman]

> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:12:09 -0500
> From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7 at cox.net>
> 
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:16:16 -0500, Kevin Oberman <oberman at es.net> wrote> :
> 
> >> Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 22:36:02 -0500
> >> From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7 at cox.net>
> >>
> >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:16:48 -0500, Kevin Oberman <oberman at es.net> 
> >> wrote> :
> >>
> >> > And this time I'll include the actual error. Sorry!
> >>
> >> Did you follow the /usr/ports/UPDATING? Can you show the full log of it
> >> and also show config.log? It can give the better hints for which stuff
> >> that is need to be reinstall.
> >
> > I did follow /usr/ports/UPDATING using 'pkgdb -Ff' and
> > portupgrade. Other than the problem with libtool from the Gnumeric
> > install, everything went smoothly.
> >
> > I will attach the full build log and config.log files. I have taken
> > the failed libtool call, extracted all of the referenced libraries, and
> > run ldd over all of them. None shows libglade-2.0 in X11R6.
> >
> > I'm in agreement with Joe that the problem is some stale file, but, if
> > it's orphaned in the ports system, I'm unsure how to track it down.
> 
> The logs help, it looks like goffice is the blame at most. Try to
> reinstall both devel/goffice and devel/popt. Why devel/popt? Because, it
> is still linking on libc.so.6, which your system has libc.so.7. See errors
> in your config.log:
> 
> ========================> =====================
> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libgsf-gnome-1.so.113, needed by
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libgoffice-1.so, may conflict with libgsf-gnome-1.so.114
> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libgsf-1.so.113, needed by
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libgoffice-1.so, may conflict with libgsf-1.so.114
> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libc.so.6, needed by /usr/local/lib/libpopt.so, may
> conflict with libc.so.7
> /lib/libc.so.6: warning: WARNING!  setkey(3) not present in the system!
> /lib/libc.so.6: warning: warning: this program uses gets(), which is
> unsafe.
> /lib/libc.so.6: warning: warning: mktemp() possibly used unsafely;
> consider using mkstemp()
> /lib/libc.so.6: warning: WARNING!  des_setkey(3) not present in the system!
> /lib/libc.so.6: warning: WARNING!  encrypt(3) not present in the system!
> /lib/libc.so.6: warning: warning: tmpnam() possibly used unsafely;
> consider using mkstemp()
> /lib/libc.so.6: warning: warning: this program uses f_prealloc(), which is
> not recommended.
> /lib/libc.so.6: warning: WARNING!  des_cipher(3) not present in the system!
> /lib/libc.so.6: warning: warning: tempnam() possibly used unsafely;
> consider using mkstemp()
> ========================> =====================
> 
> Maybe you might want to run 'make delete-old ; make delete-old-libs' in 
> /usr/src to clean up your system, but I don't know if libc.so.6 is in the
> remove list in -CURRENT yet.

Mezz,

Thanks! That did the trick.

Since I did the portupgrade procedure and I know that goffice was
re-built (i happened to be watching as that one went by), I am baffled
as to why it linked to the wrong libs, but I suspect it had to do with
the upgrade sequence being wrong and it linked to something that had not
been re-built for some reason.

I was also able to fetch nautilus-open-terminal today, so the update is
now complete.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman at es.net			Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 224 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20061016/9a7f10a1/attachment.pgp