What type of hardware are you using?
Eugene Rogoza
euroABITOFJUNK at i.com.ua
Wed Jan 18 05:51:58 PST 2006
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:53:53 -0600
> From: "Scott T. Hildreth" <shildreth at allantgroup.com>
> Subject: What type of hardware are you using?
> To: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome at freebsd.org>
> Message-ID: <1136994833.11930.62.camel at scotth.emsphone.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> At home, my machine is a 1 GHZ, with 768 mb of memory. I use xfce4,
> evolution, firefox, gnome-office, ...etc. It seems that with every
> upgrade, the 1GHZ cpu is not enough power anymore. I use evolution
> at work, but I am trying Thunderbird at home now. The new evolution
> is too slow on my home server. Thunderbird is better (less cpu
> intensive), but not snappy by any means. Plus I miss some of the
> features of Evolution, but this is straying from my question. Has
> anyone else noticed this issue or is everyone else running on faster
> processors?
>
> Thanks,
> STH
> --
> Scott T. Hildreth <shildreth at allantgroup.com>
>
Hi,
I am using Dell Inspiron 700m laptop
(http://www1.us.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/entnb_700m?c=us&cs=19&l=en&s=dhs&~ck=mn)
Intel Pentium-M Dothan 2.00 GHz
512 MB RAM
Intel i810 video
80GB harddisk
I have both FreeBSD 6.0/GNOME 2.12 and Windows XP on the same machine.
Should say that Windows works way faster.
On FreeBSD the heavy things are:
Evolution (very heavy, especially with spamd)
GNOME start menu (it is being "calculated" from .desktop-files, thank
god just once)
Nautilus (although I have all the previews switched off)
Firefox works tolerably (I would say a bit slower than IE in WinXP).
Eugene
--
======================== IMPORTANT ==========================
When replying to this message, please remove the capitalized
letters from my e-mail address. Thank you.
More information about the freebsd-gnome
mailing list