evolution-exchange connector port

[Roman Bogorodskiy]

  Jeremy Messenger wrote:

> >I think I've bumped all ports which explicitly depend on gnutls, so
> >people who use portupgrade(1) (or other smart tools) should not have
> >problems with that.
> 
> No, you didn't bump all of them. A few apps were broke with the very  
> lastest ports/apps installed as I couldn't run them. See here:
> 
> % ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/buoh | grep gnu
>         libgnutls.so.15 => /usr/local/lib/libgnutls.so.15 (0x288a2000)
> 
> % ldd /usr/X11R6/lib/evolution/2.4/components/libevolution-calendar.so |  
> grep gnu
>         libgnutls.so.15 => /usr/local/lib/libgnutls.so.15 (0x2843d000)
> 
> I am sure that you only followed bump those ports by find LIB_DEPENDS, but  

That's what I mean when I say "explicitly depend".

> you didn't find any ports that depend on gnutls by like buoh -> libsoup ->  
> gnutls. As you can see a proof of evolution(-exchange) couldn't find  
> libgnutls.so.12 above. :-)
> 
> BTW: I did committed buoh a bump other days ago, but not a few ports which  
> I got lazy by use portupgrade.

Ok, I'll add an entry to UPDATING then.

Roman Bogorodskiy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20060112/610b6e72/attachment.bin