Failed to build eclipse with gnome 2.12 (failed on cario)

Greg Lewis glewis at
Wed Nov 9 07:52:09 PST 2005

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:41:25AM +0200, Panagiotis Astithas wrote:
> >>To follow up, it appears that the files patched are just for the
> >>standard 32-bit implementation.  For 64-bit, those files appear to be
> >>copied over then regenerated from the class file.  So, the problem is
> >>that is not patched and it doesn't correspond to the new
> >>cairo.c.  Using cairo in its current state should not really be possible
> >>even on i386 as they don't match up.
> >> 
> >>
> >Sounds like true. But I am not an eclipse expert. Please speak up to 
> >patch author to finish this work.
> In the meantime you could check the original patches at:
> It seems there are some extra patches that Andreas hasn't kept in his 
> version, that might make a difference on amd64.

Actually, I think that what is needed is the extra patches to the .java
files (as Sean points out) from the original patch and additional patches
for the amd64 platform (since that isn't included in the original patch
or Andreas).

If I have time I'll try and look at this today.

Greg Lewis                          Email   : glewis at
Eyes Beyond                         Web     :
Information Technology              FreeBSD : glewis at

More information about the freebsd-gnome mailing list