Joe Marcus Clarke
marcus at marcuscom.com
Fri Mar 18 21:36:46 PST 2005
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 22:39 -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> Murray Stokely wrote:
> > How important is fam to GNOME. Should we add a commented out entry to
> > inetd.conf? Any comment on PR: conf/74004?
> > - Murray
> What I'd like to see more than anything is a set of step-by-step
> instructions for getting fam up and running. I tried at one point, and
> couldn't get it to work right. If there were a handbook entry that gave
> step-by-step instructions, or a more complete pkg-message in the fam
> port itself, I wouldn't think that an inetd.conf entry is even necessary.
FAM is pretty easy to deploy these days. All that's needed is the
inetd.conf entry, then killall -HUP inetd. I really think we should
consider teaching fam to do its own activation. We could make it an
optional knob in the Makefile.
> # Adam
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20050319/beefc522/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-gnome