on the usefulness of vendor's self tests
Joe Marcus Clarke
marcus at marcuscom.com
Fri Jul 29 04:26:02 GMT 2005
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 22:01 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Whatever you decide to do, be sure to add my patch attached to:
>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302585
>
> The last hunk in it was missing in the version of patch-crlgen.c, that I sent
> to the list earlier. This hunk fixes the problem on all architectures (even
> if the tests were failing on amd64 only).
How does the last hunk in this patch fix a memory corruption problem on
amd64? The last hunk is:
@@ -1078,5 +1078,5 @@
PORT_SetError(SEC_ERROR_INVALID_ARGS);
crlgen_PrintError(crlGenData->parsedLineNum,
- "insufficient number of arguments.\n");
+ "AddCert(%s, %s) insufficient number of arguments.\n", certId, revocationDate);
return SECFailure;
}
Joe
--
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20050729/0d5a2263/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-gnome
mailing list