on the usefulness of vendor's self tests

Joe Marcus Clarke marcus at marcuscom.com
Fri Jul 29 04:26:02 GMT 2005


On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 22:01 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Whatever you decide to do, be sure to add my patch attached to:
> 
> 	https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302585
> 
> The last hunk in it was missing in the version of patch-crlgen.c, that I sent 
> to the list earlier. This hunk fixes the problem on all architectures (even 
> if the tests were failing on amd64 only).

How does the last hunk in this patch fix a memory corruption problem on
amd64?  The last hunk is:

@@ -1078,5 +1078,5 @@
         PORT_SetError(SEC_ERROR_INVALID_ARGS);
         crlgen_PrintError(crlGenData->parsedLineNum,
-                          "insufficient number of arguments.\n");
+                          "AddCert(%s, %s) insufficient number of arguments.\n", certId, revocationDate);
         return SECFailure;
     }

Joe

-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20050729/0d5a2263/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-gnome mailing list