HEADS UP: New gettext update

[Joe Marcus Clarke]

On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 15:12, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> >> (01.23.2004 @ 1449 PST): Joe Marcus Clarke said, in 1.1K: <<
> > I'm sure that by now, people have seen that the main gettext port was
> > updated to 0.13, and 0.12.1 was moved to gettext-old.  This is going to
> > cause some headaches for GNOME users (well, anyone really).  What you
> > need to do is first remove gettext, then install gettext-old.  At that
> > point, you should be okay.
> > 
> > What would be nice is for someone with a fast machine to modify the
> > necessary GNOME bits to use the new gettext, and do a full GNOME build. 
> > If that works, we can migrate GNOME over to the new gettext (and then
> > we'll have to remove gettext-old, and install gettext...).  Yes, this
> > sucks.
> >> end of "HEADS UP: New gettext update" from Joe Marcus Clarke <<
> 
> Should it be backed out until it can be better thought out and tested?
> I tried a clean build test with the new gettext, and it's stopped cold.
> This breaks *everything* in GNOME afaict.

What do you mean by, "stops cold?"  I have no problem with backing this
out...but I like Mezz's suggestion, too.

Joe

> 
> # Adam
> 
> 
> --
> Adam Weinberger
> adam at vectors.cx // adamw at FreeBSD.org // adamw at magnesium.net
> http://www.vectors.cx
-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20040123/331c79a2/attachment-0001.bin