glib20 vs ruby-gtktrayicon, PTHREAD_(CFLAGS|LIBS) issue?

[Joe Marcus Clarke]

On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 17:23, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 16:12:04 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke  
> <marcus at marcuscom.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 14:00, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I am about to take the ruby-gtktrayicon as maintaiership, but I seem  
> >> can't
> >> reproduce the same problem as what Kris's cluster build is having. I  
> >> have
> >> tried change lib_r and pthread by via the libmap.conf and I am still  
> >> able
> >> to install it. Is it already fixed recently or so?
> >>
> >> Kris has marked it as broke last July 11th. The fail build log looks  
> >> like:
> >>
> >> =========================================
> >> ===>  Configuring for ruby18-gtktrayicon-0.1.0
> >> ===>  Running extconf.rb to configure
> >> checking for GCC... yes
> >> checking for rb_define_alloc_func()... yes
> >> checking for rb_block_proc()... yes
> >> checking for new allocation framework... yes
> >> checking for attribute assignment... yes
> >> checking for gtk+-2.0... /libexec/ld-elf.so.1:
> >> /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.400: Undefined symbol
> >> "pthread_getschedparam"
> >> *** Error code 1
> >>
> >> Stop in /a/ports/x11/ruby-gtktrayicon.
> >> =========================================
> >>
> >> I have searched and I have found three sources:
> >>
> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=50402
> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=51533
> >> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=5714355
> >>
> >> Is it safe for me to remove the broke line from Makefile since I can't
> >> reproduce this problem?
> >
> > Looks to me like these ports may need RUBY_WITH_PTHREAD=yes.  From what
> > I can tell, a simple "require gtk2" causes the undefined symbol error.
> 
> One more thing, can you reproduce this problem? I have edited libmap.conf  
> to point everything on pthread, then reboot and I still can't reproduce  
> it. Can I take out the BROKE out from Makefile and test on pointyhat one  
> more time to see if this problem still exists?

I can easily reproduce this on 4.X.

Joe

> 
> Cheers,
> Mezz
> 
> > Joe
> >
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Mezz
-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20040815/b5628b41/attachment.bin