gtk port breakage
Joe Marcus Clarke
marcus at marcuscom.com
Sun Apr 11 01:03:17 GMT 2004
On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 20:58, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 17:26:41 -0700, Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org>
> > I'm not going to report further gtk build failures because there are
> > too many of them..check bento's i386 builds for lists of broken ports
> > if you're interested.
> How would you, FreeBSD GNOME team, like us to do if we want to help? Send
> patch to PR and contract to the maintainers or go ahead send to
> gnome at FreeBSD.org and will get commit right away?
This kind of thing should be handled by individual port maintainers.
I've added a CHANGES entry so porters know that there was a change, and
how to correct it. I've taken care of the last few gnome@ ports that
If anyone needs help fixing these problems, gnome@ will be happy to
offer advice on a case-by-case basis. For now, if you use an affected
port, send a patch to the maintainer.
> > Kris
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20040410/bb33adf6/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-gnome