OCE and GPT. No Dice!

[Andriy Gapon]

on 26/04/2010 16:58 Lister said the following:
> $ dumpfs /dev/da0p2
> magic   19540119 (UFS2) time    Sun Apr 25 20:40:18 2010
> superblock location     65536   id      [ 4bd08383 b5a1e1a4 ]
> ncg     205     size    50384895        blocks  50359677
> bsize   65536   shift   16      mask    0xffff0000
> fsize   65536   shift   16      mask    0xffff0000
> frag    1       shift   0       fsbtodb 7
> minfree 8%      optim   time    symlinklen 120
> maxbsize 65536  maxbpg  8192    maxcontig 2     contigsumsize 2
> nbfree  49949427        ndir    5       nifree  6350052 nffree  0
> bpg     245897  fpg     245897  ipg     30976   unrefs  0
> nindir  8192    inopb   256     maxfilesize     36033195603132415
> sbsize  8192    cgsize  65536   csaddr  125     cssize  65536
> sblkno  2       cblkno  3       iblkno  4       dblkno  125
> cgrotor 57      fmod    0       ronly   0       clean   1
> avgfpdir 64     avgfilesize 16384
> flags   soft-updates
> fsmnt   /SH/huge
> volname         swuid   0
> 
> I'd also like to suggest growfs be in a bug state for the same reason as
> dumpfs. It reports its error in blocks while it takes input in sectors.

OK, it seems that tunefs -m output has already been fixed in r198231 on Feb 9.
This has already been MFC-ed to stable/8, not sure about stable/7.

> -----
> Hatem Kawashti
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andriy Gapon" <avg at icyb.net.ua>
> To: "Lister" <lister at kawashti.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 15:50
> Subject: !Probable-UBE! Re: OCE and GPT. No Dice!
> 
> 
>> on 26/04/2010 16:34 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>> on 26/04/2010 16:31 Lister said the following:
>>>> I didn't think 50384895 was in blocks because growfs itself takes -s
>>>> <sectors> for input and it's man page has nothing about errors in
>>>> blocks, or at all!
>>>> Again, according to dumpfs manpage, and I quote "If -m is specified, a
>>>> newfs(8) command is printed that can be used to generate a new file
>>>> system with equivalent settings." newfs takes -s <sectors> not blocks.
>>>> Given that, dumpfs has a bug, at least with -m option.
>>>
>>> Yep, I agree, it's a mess.
>>
>> In fact, it's quite strange.
>> Can you provide output of dumpfs without -m option, only the header
>> (before first
>> blank line)?
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Andriy Gapon


-- 
Andriy Gapon