GEOM stripe + concat
Sergey Lungu
sergey.lungu at gmail.com
Tue Jan 24 12:24:53 PST 2006
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:22:57 +0300 I wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE running on my FTP server. There are three
> disks on that box: two identical 120GB and one 300GB. I am using
> gvinum for stripping between first two disks. I am going to give
> gstripe a try, sine gvinum is too unstable.
Since nobody has answered my question, possibly it was too silly, I
decided to experiment a bit. I'll answer my questions:
> Am I able to concatenate created stripe with 300GB disk?
Yes, you can!
> And is it wise at all?
I have made some simple benchmarking on three different geometries.
Legend:
a * b - stripping between a and b
a + b - concatenation of a and b
ad1 - 120GB disk
ad2 - 120GB disk
ad3 - 300GB disk
I tried to upload and then download a 700MB movie. Here are my results:
ad1 * ad2:
Uploading: 1m8.406s
Downloading: 1m4.656s
ad1 * ad2 + ad3:
Uploading: 1m4.115s
Downloading: 1m4.962s
ad1 + ad2 + ad3:
Uploading: 1m4.110s
Downloading: 1m4.971s
Conclusion:
There is no big difference between all this geometries in FTP context,
or possibly there are some on high load!?
--
Sergey Lungu
Fuzzy project objectives are used to avoid the
embarrassment of estimating the corresponding costs.
More information about the freebsd-geom
mailing list