CALL FOR TESTERS: geom_vol_cd9660 class
saturnero at freesbie.org
Wed Jul 27 01:10:52 GMT 2005
Pawel Jakub Dawidek ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:06:58PM +0200, Dario Freni wrote:
> +> Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> +> > What's wrong with glabel(8)?
> +> Honestly, I didn't know it before. Looking into NanoBSD code I saw it
> +> use GEOM_VOL, so I started investigate on geom_vol_ffs and write this
> +> tiny class. Agreeing with Andreas Kohn on current@:
> +> <quote>
> +> But, the really important question is: why is there geom_vol_ffs and
> +> geom_label? Apparently I wasn't the only one who did not see
> +> geom_label :)
> +> </quote>
> That's actually my fault. I wanted to remove geom_vol_ffs long time
> ago to not confuse the users.
> To not make your work useless, could you verify iso9660 part of
> geom_label? Maybe I missed something there.
I'm not so expert on this topic, but i stole part of my code from
/sys/isofs/cd9660/cd9660_vfsops.c. I used the iso.h which has some
useful structs to handle primary/sierra/supplementary descriptors.
glabel is definitely ok for me, but please put that warning on
geom_vol_ffs :) Anyway, I had fun with geom.
Bye and thanks,
Dario Freni (saturnero at freesbie.org)
FreeSBIE developer (http://www.freesbie.org)
GPG Public key at http://www.saturnero.net/saturnero.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom/attachments/20050727/1608fa9d/signature.bin
More information about the freebsd-geom