gbde: ufs & ffs
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Tue Nov 23 12:44:54 GMT 2004
In message <200411231239.33577.list-freebsd-2004 at morbius.sent.com>, RW writes:
>
>Why does the gbde section of the Handbook recommend running fsck -p -t ffs,
>which calls fsck_ffs, when ordinary filesystems are checked with fsck_ufs.
ufs and ffs are two sides of the same one filesystem. The difference
is mainly that ufs _could_ potentially be shared with another filesystem
using a different storage policy as well.
Therefore, in my opinion, the correct name is FFS.
>According to
><http://sixshooter.v6.thrupoint.net/jeroen/faq.html#UFS-DIFF-FFS>, ffs runs
>on top of ufs "providing directory structure information, and a variety of
>disk access optimizations".
That is 180 degrees wrong.
>Am I correct in thinking that soft-updates
>protect ffs from inconsistency, so that only a background ufs check is
>required?
yes.
>Is it possible to background check gbde partitions? If so, can it be done
>after booting is complete?
yes.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the freebsd-geom
mailing list