Could mount_msdosfs be less cryptic and more compatible with fsck_msdosfs?

[Lev Serebryakov]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 18.01.2015 01:49, Lev Serebryakov wrote:

> I don't know what should I do to mount this image. I'm using
> 10-STABLE.
 And msdosfs.ko could not be built with MSDOSFS_DEBUG due to lot of
errors, some of them in format strings (harmless) and some of them
not-so-harmless, as it try to use rw_lock().

- -- 
// Lev Serebryakov AKA Black Lion
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
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=0FbC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----