fixing "umount -f" for the NFS client

[Marcelo Araujo]

2013/9/5 Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk at mit.edu>

> On Wed, 4 Sep 2013, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
>  Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I think there are spare vfsops fields, so the MFC can be done in an
>>> ABI-compatible way.  The new routine is for optional functionality,
>>> so it
>>> seems fine.
>>>
>>>  There are spares vfs ops in 10/current, but not in stable/9. An MFC will
>> result in a VFS ABI change. (Since 10.0 hasn't been released yet, I didn't
>> use one of the recently added spares.)
>>
>
> Oh, right, I was looking at 10/current.
>
> Unless there are pressing calls for the feature in the stable branches,
> it's probably best to hold off on the MFC, then.  OpenAFS has encountered a
> few KBI incompatibilities over the years (mostly in the networking bits, if
> I remember correctly), and we can deal in the future, but not having to is
> nice.
>
>
Hello Guys,

Is it possible to have it on 9-STABLE?
I tried to port the changes of revision 255136 made by rmacklem@ to a
9.1-RELEASE but the bug is still there.
*
*
Any change to make it works on 9.1, 9.2 or 9-STABLE?
The patch attached is based on 9.1-RELEASE.

Best Regards,
-- 
Marcelo Araujo
araujo at FreeBSD.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: nfs_purge.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2792 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/attachments/20131015/f1f59575/attachment.obj>