ZFS default compression algo for contemporary FreeBSD versions

[Xin Li]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 7/4/13 1:27 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> 04.07.2013 19:02, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 04/07/2013 18:57 Volodymyr Kostyrko said the following:
>>> Yes. Much better in terms of speed.
>> 
>> And compression too.
> 
> Can't really say.
> 
> When the code first appeared in stable I moved two of my machines 
> (desktops) to LZ4 recreating each dataset. To my surprise gain at 
> transition from lzjb was fairly minimal and sometimes LZ4 even
> loses to lzjb in compression size. However better
> compression/decompression speed and moreover earlier takeoff when
> data is incompressible clearly makes lz4 a winner.

I'm interested in this -- what's the nature of data on that dataset
(e.g. plain text? binaries? images?)

Cheers,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJR1dzfAAoJEG80Jeu8UPuz84AIAMp8BT/a/H4tX1AzytmHxf5o
zVC7yj59BnfmkgdeKbo49fIiEafg2FHRXNsGGQ/3TvMliDqmNPvTmJQwDApH9Efl
oysm/OVcSy7ZtiT/3M2AQqNyzaIB90pidGYwO6oqZ7gwtMi6FJuiwZHsBMiHU92c
F6tieTICIWKj8cF60oWBP+kx8oM4cTfdOt1S2SGfcaBySQdmw3B7Yxg7pLHoUZ1+
6zcaoqFgSEIS8Svnk6pdOCRREUTcAKmE1W7SbEJEgeTbJ7TaCMt64yZoyQqeyayl
KBo9v8/9mYwz89L1ljHoYAXInBMUQxqIiHPvN/H1QFSZomERaLjFSYDYaIbMGeQ=
=6Zmf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----