MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions

Harald Schmalzbauer h.schmalzbauer at omnilan.de
Thu Aug 8 08:31:22 UTC 2013


 Bezüglich Kevin Oberman's Nachricht vom 08.08.2013 01:11 (localtime):
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer <
> h.schmalzbauer at omnilan.de> wrote:
>
>>  Bezüglich Attilio Rao's Nachricht vom 14.10.2012 02:27 (localtime):
>>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Attilio Rao <attilio at freebsd.org>
>> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Attilio Rao <attilio at freebsd.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao <attilio at freebsd.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> 2012/7/4 Attilio Rao <attilio at freebsd.org>:
>>>>>>> 2012/6/29 Attilio Rao <attilio at freebsd.org>:
>>>>>>>> As already published several times, according to the following plan:
>>>>>>>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I still haven't heard from Vivien or Edward, anyway as NTFS is
>>>>>>> basically only used RO these days (also the mount_ntfs code just
>>>>>>> permits RO mounting) I stripped all the uncomplete/bogus write
>> support
>>>>>>> with the following patch:
>>>>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/ntfs_remove_write.patch
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is an attempt to make the code smaller and possibly just focus
>> on
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> I've committed the FUSE support into base as r241519.
>> Thank you for your great work!
>> I had used
>> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/fuse_import/fuse_stable9_241030.patch
>> with releng/9.1.
>> Some improovements were made in the meantime in head.
>> I'm not familiar with svn.
>> Was it possible to generate a new patchset against releng/9.2? I'd have
>> to concat manually downloadad revisions via svnweb... :-(
>>
>> Thanks a lot,
>>
>> -Harry
>>
>> Already done. All of the changes in head have been back-ported to
> 9.2-PRERELEASE with the exception of a locking enhancement not available
> outside of current. You can find it at:
> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9QNUQlebx5UdlhPUTB4TXF6enc/edit?usp=sharing

Great, I found accidentally the download-arrow for
fuse_stable9_253631.patch after enabling java script - not used to
google interfaces... (for those who want to get the patch with
fetch/wget/...: 
ftp://ftp.omnilan.de/pub/FreeBSD/OmniLAN/deploy-tools/local-patches/RELENG_9_2/no_autoapply/fuse_stable9_253631.patch.orig
)

There's still only GENERIC for amd64 altered to include fuse by default.
Any reason why not i386? I'd not include it in any GENERIC kernel, I'd
prefer keeping it loadable...

Just for interest, is there a one-liner to get such a patchset out of
svn? Looks like the above was done with local sourcetree, not svn
internally?

Best regards,

-Harry


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/attachments/20130808/feae79f7/attachment.sig>


More information about the freebsd-fs mailing list