archaic/useless CFLAGS options for x86 boot blocks

Andriy Gapon avg at
Mon Sep 12 08:40:27 UTC 2011

on 12/09/2011 10:36 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> This email is in part inspired by the following problem:
> So "harmful" could also be added to the subject line.
> So here is my proposal.

I would like to clarify that my intention was to solicit opinions, explanations,
discussions, alternative proposals and *testing*.

> Part I.  ZFS and GPT bootblocks.
> I believe that we do not need here any extra optimizations and happy dances that
> seem to be carried over from boot2.
> I think that just the -Os should be sufficient of optimization flags.  Maybe
> even that is not really required.
> Rationale:
> - these boot blocks are not as nearly space-constrained as boot2
> - using untypical flags increases chances of hitting compiler bugs,
>   especially for those compilers where we are stuck with
>   unsupported / locally-maintained versions or where a compiler is maturing yet
> - assembly / machine code and debugging may become easier
> Additionally, the '/align/d' '/nop/d' filtering of the intermediate assembly
> file seems to be not needed for zfsboot.
> Part II.  The original boot2.
> My testing shows that -Os -fomit-frame-pointer are sufficient to produce a small
> enough boot2 image (~300 bytes remain available with gcc, 51 bytes for clang).
> -mrtd -mregparm=3 do not change size with gcc, but with clang they increase
> _available_ space to 79 bytes.
> The '/align/d' '/nop/d' filtering seems to shave off only 7 bytes here.
> Not suggesting anything, just an observation...
> Part III.  History.
> It seems that all those optimization related options were introduced very long
> time ago when the compiler(s) were quite different from what they are now.
> So, some re-evaluation may be (long over)due.
> For example, -fno-unit-at-a-time is definitely an anti-optmization option and it
> was introduced to fight some gcc bugs way back in 2004 (r132870).  Its merits
> have never been re-evaluated after switch to gcc 4.2, it seems.
> -fno-guess-branch-probability and -mno-align-long-strings are even less obvious
> options (see e.g. r108149).
> Finally, here is a diff:
> All the boot blocks are boot tested in qemu.
> boot2 is also tested with -mrtd -mregparm removed.

Andriy Gapon

More information about the freebsd-fs mailing list