Strange behaviour with sappend flag set on ZFS

Michael Naef cal at linu.gs
Mon Sep 27 14:24:50 UTC 2010


Hi all

On Friday 24 September 2010 01:15:55 Markus Gebert wrote:

> CURRENT and STABLE-8 seem to be affected to. The following patch
> seems to fix it (at least Michi's test case works fine with
> it):
> 
> ----
> diff -ru
> ../src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops
> .c ./sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c
> ---
> ../src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops
> .c   2010-05-19 08:49:52.000000000 +0200 +++
> ./sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c   
>     2010-09-23 23:24:43.549846948 +0200 @@ -709,7 +709,7 @@
>          */
>         pflags = zp->z_phys->zp_flags;
>         if ((pflags & (ZFS_IMMUTABLE | ZFS_READONLY)) ||
> -           ((pflags & ZFS_APPENDONLY) && !(ioflag & FAPPEND) &&
> +           ((pflags & ZFS_APPENDONLY) && !(ioflag & IO_APPEND)
> && (uio->uio_loffset < zp->z_phys->zp_size))) {
> ZFS_EXIT(zfsvfs);
>                 return (EPERM);
> ----
> 
> Can someone commit this if the patch is ok? Or should I (or
> Michi) open a PR?

Whats the next step? Is anyboby willing and able to commit the 
patch or should/must I open a PR? (Having a patch for bash which 
solves the most urgent problem, though - but I need a decision.)

cheers and thanks, Michi


More information about the freebsd-fs mailing list