Strange behaviour with sappend flag set on ZFS
Michael Naef
cal at linu.gs
Mon Sep 27 14:24:50 UTC 2010
Hi all
On Friday 24 September 2010 01:15:55 Markus Gebert wrote:
> CURRENT and STABLE-8 seem to be affected to. The following patch
> seems to fix it (at least Michi's test case works fine with
> it):
>
> ----
> diff -ru
> ../src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops
> .c ./sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c
> ---
> ../src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops
> .c 2010-05-19 08:49:52.000000000 +0200 +++
> ./sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c
> 2010-09-23 23:24:43.549846948 +0200 @@ -709,7 +709,7 @@
> */
> pflags = zp->z_phys->zp_flags;
> if ((pflags & (ZFS_IMMUTABLE | ZFS_READONLY)) ||
> - ((pflags & ZFS_APPENDONLY) && !(ioflag & FAPPEND) &&
> + ((pflags & ZFS_APPENDONLY) && !(ioflag & IO_APPEND)
> && (uio->uio_loffset < zp->z_phys->zp_size))) {
> ZFS_EXIT(zfsvfs);
> return (EPERM);
> ----
>
> Can someone commit this if the patch is ok? Or should I (or
> Michi) open a PR?
Whats the next step? Is anyboby willing and able to commit the
patch or should/must I open a PR? (Having a patch for bash which
solves the most urgent problem, though - but I need a decision.)
cheers and thanks, Michi
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list