background fsck considered harmful? (Re: panic: handle_written_inodeblock: bad size)

[Mikhail T.]

20.07.2010 11:44, Kirk McKusick написав(ла):
> Adding it to all the panic's will be a lot of work,
> but I agree would be useful. I will look into doing so when I
> get a chance.
>
> 	Kirk McKusick
>    
How about disabling background fsck in a default install? It seems to be 
the consensus here, that my troubles were due to fsck not fixing the 
file-system properly reboot after reboot...

Yours,

    -mi