ZFS patches.

OutBackdingo outbackdingo at gmail.com
Mon Jul 28 13:26:29 UTC 2008


So are we saying that i386 with a default kmem of 512MB has gotten
psuedo stable with some load?

On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 14:57 +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 02:54:36PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> > On Monday 28 July 2008 10:33:03 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > > Yes, it should fix most if not all 'kmem_map too small' panics, at least
> > > from what I tried. Tunning kmem_size is still needed to get better
> > > performance.
> > 
> > With the i386 default settings it was not too hard to get the attached panic.  
> > Some cpdup and rm cycles of src and ports to a single disk zfs pool.  With 
> > 512M I haven't been able to kill it, yet.
> 
> I was probably too optimistic. The default kmem_size is probably just
> too low. I'm quite sure it would be too low even for Solaris.
> 



More information about the freebsd-fs mailing list