Thinking of using ZFS/FBSD for a backup system

[CZUCZY Gergely]

We're still doing what we did. FBSD+ZFS _would_ have been the
replacement.
We're sucking with linux+dirvish. it's slow, dirvish is kinda retarded,
it has many flaws, but it's stable. Well, in a way, you don't lose data
like you would do with ZFS :)

On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:22:20 -0700
mike <mike503 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 7/8/08, CZUCZY Gergely <phoemix at harmless.hu> wrote:
> 
> > Regardless of this, the system worked quite well. If ZFS were
> > stable, this easily could be our backup system. ZFS is great,
> > awesome, but a bit unreliable on FreeBSD, still needs some work.
> 
> I forgot to ask - what are you doing now instead of FBSD+ZFS?


-- 

Sincerely,

Gergely CZUCZY,
Harmless Digital
mailto: gergely.czuczy at harmless.hu

Legacy software is software that works.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/attachments/20080708/2df0e7da/signature.pgp