Fw: zfs - no access to a Mac OS X zfs pool without root
privileges
Jeremy Chadwick
koitsu at FreeBSD.org
Fri Aug 8 13:12:41 UTC 2008
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 01:51:12PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> Oops, forgot to include the ML.
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:49:38 +0200
> From: Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn at freenet.de>
> To: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu at FreeBSD.org>
> Subject: Re: zfs - no access to a Mac OS X zfs pool without root privileges
>
>
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 04:26:13 -0700
> Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 01:01:27PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> [BIG snip]
> > > mirpool aclinherit restricted default <==
> > > mirpool canmount on default
> > > mirpool shareiscsi off default
> > > mirpool xattr off temporary
> > > mirpool copies 1 default
> > > mirpool version 1 -
> > > mirpool utf8only off -
> > > mirpool normalization none -
> > > mirpool casesensitivity sensitive -
> > > mirpool vscan off default
> > > mirpool nbmand off default
> > > mirpool sharesmb off default
> > > mirpool refquota none default
> > > mirpool refreservation none default
> > >
> > > root:peedub:~:bash:2> zfs set aclinherit=secure mirpool
> > > property 'aclinherit' not supported on FreeBSD: permission denied
> > >
> > > Apparently it's not really used.
> >
> > You need to remember the individual is using the patch on CURRENT
> > provided by pjd, which bring ZFS up to the latest OpenSolaris version.
> > It's possible on that version it *is* implemented; I do not know.
> >
> > Based on the manpage description for aclinherit, that option could
> > definitely cause what he's seeing.
> >
>
> I _am_ using the patched version from pjd at .
>
> garyj:peedub:freebsd:-bash:11> grep ZFS /var/run/dmesg.boot
> WARNING: ZFS is considered to be an experimental feature in FreeBSD.
> ZFS filesystem version 11
> ZFS storage pool version 11
Then I don't have an explanation. The only thing different I see about
the filesystem is that aclinherit option is "restricted" (and the value
of that option, I believe, could cause what you're seeing), while on
ZFS fs/pool version 6, the default appears to be "secure". Possibly
they're the same, just renamed?
--
| Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list