readv: parallel or sequential?
peter.schuller at infidyne.com
Thu Dec 20 12:40:08 PST 2007
> Yes, but how can it now that it is on a RAID0 and taking advantage of
> multiple spindles instead of making it worse?
> The FS has to do sensible things for single spindle as well.
> And normaly disks are fastest when reading linear and with disk read
> caches this doesn't even have to be interleaved.
> I don't see any potential for parallell access within the same file
> beside some special constructed cases maybe.
I strongly disagree here. I would expect the operating system to not serialize
all I/O to the same file descriptor/file, if done in paralell from multiple
threads or through AIO. I have at least on use case heavily dependent on
this - does this mean FreeBSD would not be usable for this?
Not to mention things like databases (e.g. high concurrency I/O in PostgreSQL
or whatever). You most definitely want concurrent I/O if supported by the
Are we saying here that I/O scheduling happens at a just below the file
system, rather than at the individual device level? I would have assumed that
a particular geom class would just forward (modified) I/O requests to the
underlying device, such that when the request reaches a device actually doing
I/O to some external entity, it can intelligently schedule in a way that is
Or am I misunderstanding something in this discussion?
/ Peter Schuller
PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <peter.schuller at infidyne.com>'
Key retrieval: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey at scode.org
E-Mail: peter.schuller at infidyne.com Web: http://www.scode.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/attachments/20071220/0bdf49de/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-fs