patchset-9 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the
unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010)
Daichi GOTO
daichi at freebsd.org
Thu Mar 16 06:12:46 UTC 2006
Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
> Daichi GOTO wrote:
>> All folks have interests in improved unionfs should keep attentions
>> and ask "how about merge?" at every turn :)
>
> OK. How about a merge?
>
> I'd really like to see this in 6-STABLE.
Me too, but unfortunately it is difficult with some reasons
(detail information http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/).
Of course, our patch gives the conditions for integration of
-current OK. For -stable is BAD.
We must keep the API compatibility of command/library
for integration of -stable. With some technical/specifical
reasons, our improved unionfs has a little uncompatibility.
For the last time, integration of -stable will be left
to the judgment of src committers and others.
> Regards,
>
> Jan Mikkelsen.
--
Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi
More information about the freebsd-fs
mailing list